Διάδοχος Θεότροπος έγραψε:Οι Ρώσοι πρέπει να καταλάβουν ότι το μέλλον τους είναι υπαρχηγοί των Κινέζων. Να αφήσουν τα ευρασιατικά οράματα όπου είναι αυτοί αρχηγοί.
Εθνικοφιλελευθερος έγραψε:Διάδοχος Θεότροπος έγραψε:Οι Ρώσοι πρέπει να καταλάβουν ότι το μέλλον τους είναι υπαρχηγοί των Κινέζων. Να αφήσουν τα ευρασιατικά οράματα όπου είναι αυτοί αρχηγοί.
το ευρασιατικο ονειρο των ρωσων ΔΕΝ περιλαμβανει την κινα αλλα την δικη τους κυριαρχια στην μεση περιοχ και να ειναι επικυριαρχοι στην ευρωπη
και εκει ακριβως κουμπωνει η παρουσια της αιγειακης
China's new defence chief visits Russia to 'let the Americans know' about their deep military ties
China's new defence minister has said his visit to Russia is a signal to the United States about the increasingly close military ties between Moscow and Beijing.
The unusually bold statement by General Wei Fenghe reflected the growing military cooperation between the two former Communist rivals.
Speaking in Moscow at the start of his talks with Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, Mr Wei emphasised that he chose Russia for his first trip abroad to "show the world … [the] firm determination of our armed forces to strengthen strategic cooperation".
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-04/c ... us/9616216
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/as ... story.html
CONCLUSIONS
866. Having thoroughly considered the submissions of the Parties, the written evidence as
well as the oral evidence and testimonies provided at the six-day hearing, the Panel, for
the reasons set out above, finds that the Respondent has not discharged its burden of
proving to the Panel’s comfortable satisfaction that the Appellant committed an ADRV
during the Sochi Games. The Panel was unable to find the commission of either an
ADRV in the form of the use of a prohibited substance, i.e. having used the Duchess
Cocktail, under Article 2.2 of the WADC, or in the form of the use of a prohibited
method, i.e. urine substitution, pursuant to Article 2.2 of the WADC in connection with
M2.1 of the WADA 2014 Prohibited List, or an ADRV in the form of tampering in
accordance with Article 2.5 of the WADC, or an ADRV in the form of cover-up of or
complicity in an ADRV under Article 2.8 of the WADC.
In reaching these conclusions, the Panel wishes to underscore what it has not decided in
this appeal. The Panel has not made a ruling on whether and to what extent the alleged
doping scheme during the Sochi Games existed and how it operated even though it
recognizes that there is significant evidence that it was in place and worked. Moreover,
the Panel did not consider it possible to conclude that the existence of a general doping
and cover-up scheme, even if established, would inexorably lead to a conclusion the
Athlete committed the ADRVs alleged by the IOC.
868. What the Panel, in the appeal of an individual athlete against the finding of various
ADRVs, did decide is simply this: for all of the reasons outlined in this award, the
evidence presented before the Panel does not justify the conclusion to the comfortable
satisfaction of the Panel that the Athlete, through acts or omissions, individually
committed any of the alleged ADRVs.
Συνολικά, σ’ όλη την επικράτεια της Ρωσίας κατά τη διάρκεια των διαδηλώσεων που στρέφονταν κατά του Πούτιν συνελήφθησαν 1600 άτομα.
